Skip to main content

Page 20

3. Water was added to remove any underacted copper(II) sulfate, iron, and iron(II) sulfate. The solution was washed to isolate the copper.

4. The water added didn't matter if the measurement w for water was exact because it wasn't included in the reaction. Water was only used to wash the copper and help facilitate the reaction.

5. Fe+CuCO4->Cu+FeSO4     The formula for the iron-containing compound was FeSO4. The observations support this as the color of the copper(II) sulfate solution got darker, so it is iron(II) that was used. So, it would be Fe2++SO42-->FeSO4, making the formula FeSO4.

6. 95.2% Yield     119.42g-117.25g=2.17g     (2.17/2.28)*100=95.2%

Conclusion:

The purpose of this lab was to practice identifying and calculating limiting reactants. We did this by combining copper(II) sulfate with iron filings and weighing the mass of the empty beaker, beaker with copper, and both reactants to use the mass to calculate the theoretical yield, actual yield, and percent yield. Through achieving this purpose, we were able to determine the limiting reactant and percent yield using the mass, and used observations to determine the charge of the iron used, when the reaction was complete, and what